Funding Priorities

The goal of the Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council is to fund the services that people living with HIV/AIDS need the most.

Learn more about:

For details on the federal Ryan White program, read about HRSA's HIV/AIDS Program Legislation.

To view a history of Part A allocations and expenditures for the Baltimore EMA and all EMAs across the country, see HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau's Grantee Allocations & Expenditures.

View FY 2017's priorities and funding allocation:

  • FY 2017 Part A and MAI Funding Allocations(funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss using the current 75/25 percent allocation restrictions and (b) funding loss contingent on approval of a 75/25 percent allocation waiver for both the Part A and Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI) grants.
View FY 2016's priorities and funding allocations:
  • FY 2016 Part A and MAI Allocations (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss using the current 75/25 percent allocation restrictions and (b) funding loss contingent on approval of a 75/25 percent allocation waiver for both the Part A and Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI) grants.
View FY 2015's priorities and funding allocations:
  • FY 2015 Part A and MAI Allocations (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss using the current 75/25 percent allocation restrictions and (b) funding loss contingent on approval of a 75/25 percent allocation waiver for both the Part A and Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI) grants.
View FY 2014's priorities and funding allocations:
  • FY 2014 Part A and MAI Allocations (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding for both the Part A and Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI) grants.
View FY 2013's priorities and funding allocations:
  • FY 2013 EMA Part A and MAI Allocations (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase for both the Part A and Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI) grants.
  • FY 2013 Services to Surrounding Counties Part A and MAI Allocations (funds allocated for services within the six suburban counties of the EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase for both the Part A and Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI) grants.

View FY 2012's priorities and funding allocations:

  • FY 2012 EMA Part A Allocations and Subsequent Funding Changes (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase. The document also contains any subsequent changes in funding made throughout the fiscal year. Last updated March 14, 2012.
  • FY 2012 Counties Part A Allocations and Subsequent Funding Changes (funds allocated for services within the six suburban counties of the EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase.The document also contains any subsequent changes in funding made throughout the fiscal year. Last updated March 14, 2012.

View FY 2011's priorities and funding allocations:

  • FY 2011 EMA Part A Allocations and Subsequent Funding Changes (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase. The document also contains any subsequent changes in funding made throughout the fiscal year. Last updated January 31, 2012.

View FY 2010's priorities and funding allocations:

  • FY 2010 EMA Allocations (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase.
  • FY 2010 Counties Allocations (funds allocated for services within the six suburban counties of the EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase.

View FY 2010's Ryan White Part A and MAI programs, by service category:
View FY 2009's priorities and funding allocations:
  • FY 2009 EMA Allocations (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase.
  • FY 2009 Counties Allocations (funds allocated for services within the six suburban counties of the EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase.

View FY 2008's Ryan White Part A and MAI programs, by service category:
View FY 2008's priorities and funding allocations:
  • FY 2008 EMA Allocations (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase
  • FY 2008 Counties Allocations (funds allocated for services within the six suburban counties of the EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase.

View FY 2007's priorities and funding allocations:
  • FY 2007 EMA Allocations, revised (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under three funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss of 0.01 percent through 10.00 percent, (b) a funding loss of 10.01 percent through infinity, and (c) a funding increase of 0.00 percent and up through infinity.
  • FY 2007 Counties Allocations, revised (funds allocated for services within the six suburban counties of the EMA). This document shows funding allocations under three funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss of 0.01 percent through 10.00 percent, (b) a funding loss of 10.01 percent through infinity, and (c) a funding increase of 0.00 percent and up through infinity.
  • FY 2007 MAI Allocations, final (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA).
  • FY 2007 MAI Counties Allocations, final (funds allocated for services within the six suburban counties of the EMA).

View FY 2006's priorities and funding allocations:

Planning Council Support Office

The planning council's administrative affairs are managed by:

The Taylor-Wilks Group
116 E. 25th Street
Baltimore, MD 21218

Phone: 410.662.7253
Fax: 410.662.7254
Web: www.taylor-wilksgroup.com

      IN THIS SECTION
»   Funding Priorities
º  Service Needs of PLWH/As
º  How Services are Funded
Home · Funding · Membership · Committee Descriptions · Meetings · Documents · Ryan White Program
Links · Contacts 
Copyright © 2017 InterGroup Services, Inc. All rights reserved.
To view most of our documents you'll need FREE Adobe Acrobat Reader.